Authors: David E. Murphy
One security component in the Soviet establish-
ment was ideally situated to observe and report on the progress of the
German buildup across the frontier. This was the Chief Directorate of
Border Troops (GUPV), whose forces covered every kilometer of the west-
ern borders of the USSR from the Barents Sea to the Black Sea. Although
the border troops regard May 28, 1918, as their official founding, it was not
until 1939 that a separate directorate was established. Throughout the
1920s and 1930s, the border troops were included administratively with
troops responsible solely for internal security. Their official history main-
tains that throughout these years their main concern was protection of
the Soviet regime against ‘‘spies, saboteurs, and terrorists,’’ whether dis-
patched by anti-Soviet émigré organizations or foreign intelligence ser-
vices. This responsibility extended to interception of smugglers or any
persons attempting to enter the USSR illegally. This is the version featured
in the exhibits and lectures at the Border Troops Museum in Moscow, but
it is hardly an accurate reflection of border troop activities. Nor does it
account for the extensive network of border zones and physical obstacles
patrolled by the border troops inside the Soviet state frontier. The reality is
that the GUPV was just as concerned with keeping Soviet citizens from
leaving the country as it was in apprehending enemy agents infiltrating
border areas.1
THE BORDER TROOPS KNEW
125
The border troops did not escape the 1937–38 purges. With the move-
ment of the Soviet frontier westward in 1939, however, they reorganized
and expanded. Their strength rose by 50 percent during 1939–40; arma-
ments improved and increased. Still, the shift to new western borders
resulted in considerable disruption of routine. It required, among other
things, the creation of new agent nets for coverage of the areas opposite
each of the newly established border troop districts along the Finnish
frontier, on the seacoast borders of the newly acquired Baltic States, in the
new oblasts of western Belorussia and the Ukrainian SSR, and along the
Romanian frontiers of the Moldavian SSR. Arrests of German intelligence
(Abwehr) agents increased from 28 in the first quarter of 1940 to 153 in the
same period in 1941. Similar increases were noted in cross-border move-
ment of groups such as the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists. In the
period leading up to June 1941, as new Red Army units moved into the
western border areas, new liaison and communications arrangements had
to be established between military units and the border troops. These
arrangements were described in a Politburo directive of June 22, 1939.2
By the end of 1940 there were eight border troop districts (
okruga
) in
the area between the Barents Sea and the Black Sea. These districts were
located within the territories of the five western military districts: Lenin-
grad, Special Baltic, Special Western, Special Kiev, and Odessa. The over-
all strength of border troops in these districts was approximately 100,000.
Almost half the troops were stationed in the Ukrainian and Belorussian
districts. Under the eight Border Troop districts there were forty-nine de-
tachments. Each detachment (
otriad
) had from 1,400 to 2,000 men. Their
organization and armaments followed a standard pattern: a deputy com-
mander for intelligence, an intelligence department, and from four to
five border commands (
komendatury
), each with four or five outposts
(
zastavy
). The district also had a reserve, or maneuver, group of up to 250
men who could be rushed to critical areas if needed. In this connection, it
was the large-scale infiltration of sizable numbers of hostile sabotage and
intelligence teams in the 1940–41 period that caused the border troops
their greatest difficulty and had the most severe impact on the security of
the Red Army’s infrastructure. In the Belorussian and the Ukrainian bor-
der troop districts, the distance between outposts was from eight to ten
kilometers, a bit more in other areas. The border troops had no tanks or
artillery. In 1941 their light weaponry would be upgraded to include more
heavy machine guns, mortars, and antitank rifles.3
Border Troop Locations
FINLAND
Lake
Ehlisenvara
102
Onega
N
5
Ehnso
Petrozavodsk
103
Helsinki
Lake
Ladoga
Rempetti
Tallinn
7
Leningrad
6
8
Kingisepp
10
Rakvere
Khaasalu
9
Yaroslavi
Pskov
12
Liepaia
Riga
Kalinin
11
105
Krasnogorskoe
Kretinga
106
Nevel
83
Moscow
Taurage
Slobodka
107
Vitbesk
EAST
13
Mariampol
Smolensk
PRUSSIA
Vilnius
Orsha
86
Berezino
87
Minsk
Avgustov
Belostok
88
18
Orel
Shepetovo
17
GENERAL
Brest
Zhidkovichi
Gomel
98
GOVERNMENT
GERMANY
Liubomil
Kursk
90
Vladimir-Volynsky
20
91
Slavuta
Rava-Russkaia
BOHEMIA
Kiev
Peremyshl 92
MORAVIA
22
Kharkov
PROTECTORATE
Lisko 93 Lvov
Volochisk
SLOVAKIA
94
Skole
95
23
97
Nadvorna
Lipkany
Chernovitsy
24
HUNGARY
Beltsy
2
Kalarash
26
Kishinev
25
Odessa
Hqs border troops
Kagul
district
79
24
Hqs border troops
ROMANIA
Izmail
detachment
Simferopol
Sevastropol
0
100
200 mi
0
100
200
300 km
BULGARIA
Shows the cities in which the headquarters of the Leningrad, Baltic,
Belorussian, Ukrainian, Moldavian, and Black Sea border troops
districts are located. Their numbered subordinate detachments are
shown along the frontier.
THE BORDER TROOPS KNEW
127
As early as March 1939, border troop units received orders to create
additional intelligence posts so as to improve the level of cross-border
intelligence activity. On October 25, 1940, an order was given to estab-
lish new intelligence posts within the ten-kilometer border zone along the
frontier between the USSR and German-occupied Poland. They were to
consist of three officers and were to be located in large population centers;
their basic activity was to be daily operational work directed at uncovering
illegal border crossers and their accomplices.4
Between the summer of 1940 and June 1941, intelligence on the armed
forces of Germany and its allies concentrated on the Soviet border pre-
sented a major concern for the border troops. It was imperative to collect
information on German ‘‘force structure’’ and preparations for offensive
operations. It was also imperative to collect information on the Abwehr’s
plans for infiltrating Soviet frontier areas with agents or teams of agents
and then to intercept and apprehend them.
The border troops relied on observation by moving patrols and from
fixed towers or camouflaged observation and listening posts (the listening
posts were particularly effective at night). Regular patrols meant the troop
outposts became totally familiar with the physical features and human
activity in the areas across the border from them. Further information
came from the debriefing of deserters and refugees from the German oc-
cupation and from interrogation of spies and saboteurs, many of whom
were recruited by the Abwehr from the local population. Border troops
obtained specifics on the missions of these people and these often reflected
German operational plans; the debriefings and interrogations also sup-
plied general data on conditions in occupied Poland and East Prussia and
on German military activities.
Although it is known that it was not until July 31, 1940, that Hitler
advised his generals of his decision to attack Russia, on July 15 of that year
Stalin, Molotov, Voroshilov, and Timoshenko received a startling report
signed by Beria.5 It was based on a special report from Ivan I. Maslennikov,
deputy people’s commissar of internal affairs for troops. According to the
Belorussian border troop district, between July 1 and July 7 seven German
divisions arrived in Warsaw and its vicinity and were installed in towns
and villages within a sixty-kilometer radius of the city. In most cases, the
report provided regimental numbers. These troop movements caused an
interruption of passenger service between Warsaw and Lublin. Infantry,
artillery, and tanks moved in march formation from Lublin toward the
Soviet frontier. Responsibility for guarding the German side of the border
128
THE BORDER TROOPS KNEW
had been taken over from German border police by field units of the Ger-
man army. In addition, the border troops of the Ukrainian SSR had regis-
tered the arrival of German infantry and tank units in the border areas in
the direction of Peremyshl. Border troop detachments reported that in
areas opposite them, ‘‘German troops are engaged in constructing defen-
sive positions, placing mines, and improving highways.’’6
There was no special reaction from the top leadership to this report,
probably because on July 9, acting on orders from Defense Commissar
Timoshenko, Deputy Chief of the General Staff I. V. Smorodinov held a
meeting with Ernst Köstring, the German military attaché. Köstring ex-
plained that the large numbers of German troops were simply replace-
ments, now that significant contingents of troops were no longer needed in
the west.7 An untrue explanation, of course, but accepted by Stalin and his
lieutenants. Another factor that may have had a calming effect was the
signing on June 10, 1940, of a Soviet-German convention creating an ‘‘In-
stitute of Representatives for Border Affairs’’ to resolve conflicts. The So-
viet representatives were normally border troop officers from the detach-
ment nearest to a specific incident. Between January 1, 1940, and June 10,
1940, there were 22 incidents; between June 10, 1940, and January 1, 1941,
there were 187, most of which were resolved in the Soviets’ favor. It seemed
that as the Germans massed their forces along the border, they were ready
to accommodate their Soviet counterparts’ wishes. On February 13, 1941,
the deputy chief of the border troops of the Ukrainian NKVD, Ivan A.
Petrov, reported that ‘‘the Germans made a show of ostentatious politeness
but in reality they maintained a rather stubborn, well-thought-out line in
dealing with these incidents. They preferred to elevate them to the diplo-
matic level rather than react negatively.’’8
A turning point seems to have been reached in late July 1940, when
the commanding officer of the Ninetieth Border Troop Detachment, at
Vladimir-Volynsk, received a letter from the German side announcing the
arrival of the governor of occupied Poland, Hans Frank, to inspect the
frontier in the vicinity of the town of Grubeshev. ‘‘Frank and his retinue
of about thirty individuals arrived in a convoy of fourteen automobiles,
moved up and down along the frontier, and observed the Soviet side of the
border through field glasses,’’ reported the chief of staff of the Ninetieth
Detachment, who was also a ‘‘border representative.’’ After Frank’s visit,
the buildup of German forces and military construction projects in east-
ern Poland seemed to increase. German authorities explained that troops
‘‘from the French front had arrived in this ‘quiet zone’ for rest and reorga-
THE BORDER TROOPS KNEW
129
nization.’’ During July and August, ‘‘an army headquarters was established
in Warsaw, an army corps in the suburbs, as well as eight infantry division
headquarters.’’9 Undoubtedly as a result of this activity, on December 21,
1940, Beria called for retention in service of 7,000 individuals in the bor-
der troops whose terms of service would normally have expired on Janu-
ary 1, 1941.10
A report from the Ukrainian border troop district dated January 16,
1941, described a visit on December 9, 1940, by ‘‘German army commander
Field Marshal Walther von Brauchitsch to troops stationed in the area of
Sanok. Sanok is a town in southeast Poland on the river San, approxi-