Read Burma Redux: Global Justice and the Quest for Political Reform in Myanmar Online
Authors: Ian Holliday
Tags: #Political Science/International Relations/General, #HIS003000, #POL011000, #History/Asia/General
Burma Redux: Global Justice and the Quest for Political Reform in Myanmar (66 page)
57.
Charles A. Kupchan,
How Enemies Become Friends: The Sources of Stable Peace
(Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010).
58.
James Traub,
The Freedom Agenda: Why America Must Spread Democracy (Just Not the Way George Bush Did)
(New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2008).
59.
T. J. Pempel, “How Bush Bungled Asia: Militarism, Economic Indifference and Unilateralism Have Weakened the United States across Asia,”
Pacific Review
21:5 (2008), 547–81. Simon S. C. Tay,
Asia Alone: The Dangerous Post-Crisis Divide from America
(Singapore: John Wiley, 2010).
60.
Bill Emmott,
Rivals: How the Power Struggle between China, India and Japan Will Shape Our Next Decade
(London: Allen Lane, 2008).
61.
For an analysis of how a hypothetical collapse of central authority in Myanmar might be handled, see Alain Guilloux, “Myanmar: Analyzing Problems of Transition and Intervention,”
Contemporary Politics
16:4 (2010), 383–401.
62.
Zarni, “Sanctions aren’t the problem,”
Irrawaddy
, January 4, 2011. International Crisis Group,
China’s Myanmar Dilemma
, Asia Report No.177, September 14, 2009. David Arase, “Non-traditional Security in China-ASEAN Cooperation: The Institutionalization of Regional Security Cooperation and the Evolution of East Asian Regionalism,”
Asian Survey
50:4 (2010), 808–33.
63.
Robert M. Gates, “Helping Others Defend Themselves,”
Foreign Affairs
89:3 (2010), 2–6.
64.
Steven R. David,
Catastrophic Consequences: Civil Wars and American Interests
(Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2008).
65.
In January 2008, US Chargé d’affaires Shari Villarosa hosted the Chinese Ambassador for lunch, and reported that China shared a desire to see stability, development and democracy in Myanmar. While that is probably true, a key point of difference is the ordering of these objectives. US Department of State, “Chinese losing patience with Burma,” January 18, 2008. WikiLeaks US Embassy Cables, ref. 08RANGOON44.
66.
Stephanie Kleine-Ahlbrandt and Andrew Small, “China’s New Dictatorship Diplomacy,”
Foreign Affairs
87:1 (2008), 38–56.
67.
Alastair Iain Johnston,
Social States: China in International Institutions, 1980–2000
(Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008).
68.
Pak K. Lee, Gerald Chan and Lai-Ha Chan, “China in Darfur: Humanitarian Rule-maker or Rule-taker?,”
Review of International Studies
37 (2011), forthcoming.
69.
Ethan Bronner and David E. Sanger, “Arab League endorses no-flight zone over Libya,”
International Herald Tribune
, March 12, 2011.
70.
Donald K. Emmerson (ed.),
Hard Choices: Security, Democracy, and Regionalism in Southeast Asia
(Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2009).
71.
S. D. Muni,
India’s Foreign Policy: The Democracy Dimension
(New Delhi: Foundation Books, 2009). Rajiv Sikri,
Challenge and Strategy: Rethinking India’s Foreign Policy
(New Delhi: Sage, 2009). Evan A. Feigenbaum, “India’s Rise, America’s Interest,”
Foreign Affairs
89:2 (2010), 76–91. Admiral Raja Menon and Rajiv Kumar,
The Long View from Delhi: To Define the Indian Grand Strategy for Foreign Policy
(New Delhi: Academic Foundation, 2010). Robert D. Kaplan,
Monsoon: The Indian Ocean and the Future of American Power
(New York, NY: Random House, 2010).
72.
Ian Holliday, ‘Japan and the Myanmar Stalemate: Regional Power and Resolution of a Regional Problem’,
Japanese Journal of Political Science
6:3 (2005), 393–410. Ian Holliday, ‘Extending a Hand in Myanmar’,
Dissent
58:2 (Spring 2011), 14–18.
73.
Kent E. Calder,
Pacific Alliance: Reviving U.S.-Japan Relations
(New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2009).
74.
James P. Muldoon, Jr., JoAnn Fagot Aviel, Richard Reitano and Earl Sullivan (eds),
The New Dynamics of Multilateralism: Diplomacy, International Organizations, and Global Governance
(Boulder, CO: Westview, 2010).
75.
Hillary Clinton, “Leading through Civilian Power,”
Foreign Affairs
89:6 (2010), 13–24.
76.
Anne-Marie Slaughter,
A New World Order
(Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004). Anne-Marie Slaughter, “America’s Edge: Power in the Networked Century,”
Foreign Affairs
88:1 (2009), 94–113.
77.
William H. Overholt,
Asia, America, and the Transformation of Geopolitics
(New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2008).
78.
Cemil Aydin,
The Politics of Anti-Westernism in Asia: Visions of World Order in Pan-Islamic and Pan-Asian Thought
(New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 2007).
79.
The White House, “Remarks by the President on a New Beginning,” Cairo University June 4, 2009.
www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/remarks-president-cairo-university-6–04-09
.
80.
Barack H. Obama, “Nobel Lecture: A Just and Lasting Peace,” December 10, 2009.
http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/2009/obama-lecture_en.html
.
81.
Catherine Ashton, “Listening to the revolution,”
International Herald Tribune
, February 26–27, 2011, p.6.
82.
Charles McDermid, “Missing the point on Myanmar,”
Asia Times Online
, July 4, 2009.
www.atimes.com/atimes/Southeast_Asia/KG04Ae01.html
.
83.
Margaret E. Keck and Kathryn Sikkink,
Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics
(Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1998).
84.
Thomas Risse, Stephen C. Ropp and Kathryn Sikkink, eds,
The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change
(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).
85.
Tobias Böhmelt, “The Effectiveness of Tracks of Diplomacy Strategies in Third-party Interventions,”
Journal of Peace Research
47:2 (2010), 167–78.
86.
Daniel Lieberfeld, “Evaluating the Contributions of Track-two Diplomacy to Conflict Termination in South Africa, 1984–90,”
Journal of Peace Research
39:3 (2002), 355–72. Ronald J. Fisher, “Assessing the Contingency Model of Third-party Intervention in Successful Cases of Prenegotiation,”
Journal of Peace Research
44:3 (2007), 311–29.
87.
Amanda Murdie and Tavishi Bhasin, “Aiding and Abetting: Human Rights INGOs and Domestic Protest,”
Journal of Conflict Resolution
55 (2011), forthcoming.
88.
Amanda A. Licht, “Coming into Money: The Impact of Foreign Aid on Leader Survival,”
Journal of Conflict Resolution
54:1 (2010), 58–87.
89.
Amanda Murdie and David R. Davis, “Problematic Potential: The Human Rights Consequences of Peacekeeping Interventions in Civil Wars,”
Human Rights Quarterly
32:1 (2010), 49–72.
90.
Timothy Garton Ash, “Technology lets us peer inside the Burmese cage, but not unlock its door,”
Guardian
, December 15, 2010.
91.
Zarni, “Sanctions aren’t the problem.”
92.
Steven E. Finkel, Aníbal S. Pérez Liñan and Mitchell A. Seligson, “The Effects of U.S. Foreign Assistance on Democracy Building, 1990–2003,”
World Politics
59:3 (2007), 404–40.
93.
International Crisis Group,
China’s Myanmar Dilemma
, Asia Report No.177, September 14, 2009.
94.
Amitav Acharya,
Whose Ideas Matter? Agency and Power in Asian Regionalism
(Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2009).
95.
Jason Brownlee, “Can America Nation-build?,”
World Politics
59:2 (2007), 314–40.
96.
Wright,
Accepting Authoritarianism
.
97.
Jürgen Haacke,
Myanmar’s Foreign Policy: Domestic Influences and International Implications
(Abingdon: Routledge, 2006).
98.
Acharya,
Whose Ideas Matter?
, pp.31–41.
99.
Chen Jian, “China and the Bandung Conference: Changing Perceptions and Representations,” in See Seng Tan and Amitav Acharya (eds),
Bandung Revisited: The Legacy of the 1955 Asian-African Conference for International Order
(Singapore: NUS Press, 2008), 132–59, p.134.
100.
Richard Wright,
The Color Curtain: A Report on the Bandung Conference
(New York, NY: World Publishing Company, 1956), p.12.
101.
Rahul Mukherji, “Appraising the Legacy of Bandung: A View from India,” in See Seng Tan and Amitav Acharya (eds),
Bandung Revisited: The Legacy of the 1955 Asian-African Conference for International Order
(Singapore: NUS Press, 2008), 160–79, p.168.
102.
Amitav Acharya reports that a Chinese proposal to create a permanent regional organization was discussed at Bandung by three leaders: Zhou, Nehru and Nu. Acharya,
Whose Ideas Matter?
, p.77.
103.
U Nu,
U Nu: Saturday’s Son
(New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1975), pp. 225–85.
104.
Cited in Acharya,
Whose Ideas Matter?
, p.45.
105.
World Economic Forum,
Aung San Suu Kyi Addresses World Economic Forum Annual Meeting in Davos
, January 28, 2011.
www.weforum.org/news/aung-san-suu-kyi-addresses-world-economic-forum-annual-meeting-davos?fo=1
.
106.
Daniel A. Bell,
China’s New Confucianism: Politics and Everyday Life in a Changing Society
(Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008). Anand Giridharadas,
India Calling: An Intimate Portrait of a Nation’s Remaking
(New York, NY: Times Books, 2011).
Note: Name changes decreed mainly in 1989 mean that any analysis of recent history will capture many people and places under two different terms: Arakan and Rakhine, Rangoon and Yangon, and so on. In this index, all cases of split identity are listed separately.
Page numbers refer to the print edition but are hyperlinked to the appropriate location in the e-book.
Adas, Michael,
30–4
Afghanistan,
77
,
142
,
149
,
173
,
175