munities can simply hide women's violation better from legal authorities, whose profile is higher in poorer and more racially or ethnically mixed neighborhoods, where private therapy is less accessible. Also, women of color may feel the pressure alluded to in my discussion of rape to protect their partners in order to avoid the disintegration of a family and community already suffering from racism; in doing so, men of color may feel the power of patriarchy at home even if they do not feel it in the public domain. Believing that the only system designed to protect women of color has historically subjugated and exploited them, many women of color will be suspicious of the social services and legal resources designed to aid the battered woman. Poor women may simply perceive violence in the home as part of their overall struggle to feed, clothe, and shelter their families. 42
|
Invasion and intrusion of the battered woman's sense of self are the hallmark of abusive relationships, identified by hypercritical or demeaning verbal barrages, with or without physical or sexual violence, alternating with the batterer's displays of affection, remorse, or passionate sex. In this way the batterer effectively physically and emotionally ties the battered woman to him. Rosemarie Tong describes the general character of woman battering as assaultive behavior between adults in an intimate, sexual, theoretically peer, usually cohabitating relationship; the relationship can involve physical, sexual, and/or psychological abuse, or the destruction of property or pets. Cigarette burns, sleep deprivation, enforced social isolation, deprivation of medical care, beating, and threats of increased violence are not uncommon. Ola Barnett and Alyce LaViolette add that battering is not an isolated, incidental instance of hitting or verbal abuse but a systematic means of dominance and control of the battered. Some men are thought to batter to reestablish the traditional sexual division of labor lost with feminist advances at home and in the workplace. 43
|
The sexual intimacy of the partners distinguishes woman battering from at least some sexual harassment and rape and makes the criminal justice system especially reticent about interfering. Feminists debate over how much the state should regulate family, sexual, and reproductive life. However, we typically agree that many women's emotional and economic dependence on abusive partners makes it almost impossible for them to escape their sexual violation without readily available social services and legal resources. Given that almost 25 percent of all police homicides result from handling family disturbance cases, and that a woman's credibility is still a thorny issue with some policemen who may themselves be batterers, police may be slow to respond to domestic violence calls. Indeed, police arrest more women who batter in self-defense than men who offensively batter, despite the fact that a woman uses extreme violence against her partner less often than men and that women's violence against men is more often retaliatory than offensive. When a battered woman refuses to press charges out of fear of reprisal, community recrimination, or isolation, she only reinforces in the minds of the police that their call was unnecessary. Yet restraining orders are difficult to enforce even when police adopt a "pro-arrest" policy in battery investigations to inform a battered woman of her legal options, and shelters are often already full of women and children without the financial or family resources to move elsewhere. Issuing restraining orders that successfully ban the batterer from the house may only further enrage him, with no guarantee that he will not continue to threaten and harass his partner when she leaves. Thus, she effectively be-
|
|