Polyamory in the 21st Century: Love and Intimacy With Multiple Partners (42 page)

Another of the natural laws of love that polyamory inevitably highlights is the
law of unity
. Simply stated, in the new paradigm, we realize that love knows no borders and no boundaries. Love includes everyone and everything. It takes no position and rises above separation. This doesn’t mean that discernment about how and when to express love goes out the window, nor does it mean that the expression of love automatically involves sex. Instead, this new-paradigm law offers a context in which the reality of Oneness can be embodied, and practical, mutually agreeable strategies for inclusion can be negotiated with a partner or partners instead of reacting with guilt, shame, and blame.

The old paradigm for love enshrined jealousy and possessiveness. Instead of discouraging jealousy and possessiveness so that people could freely choose how they would mate, the old paradigm for love established cultural and moral barriers intended to eliminate legitimate alternatives.

By drawing a line around the couple or the nuclear family and saying, in effect, “inside this circle we share love and selflessly look out for each other, but outside this circle we keep anyone and everyone from taking what is ours,” an illusion of artificial boundaries that is increasingly difficult to maintain was created.

T H E C O S T S A N D B E N E F I T S O F P O L Y A M O R Y

2 3 9

Altruism is another expression of the law of unity. It refers to the choice to unselfishly do something that benefits someone else even to one’s own apparent detriment because the illusion of separation has been replaced with the new-paradigm reality that we are all part of the same whole. While many people willingly embrace altruism when it comes to their children or even strangers, one of the greatest challenges to experiencing joy and generosity in someone else’s good fortune seems to arise where sharing erotic or romantic love is involved. The word
compersion
grew out of the experience of polyamorous people in the Kerista commune who noticed that it was far more enjoyable to enthusiastically accept the love and pleasure their partners found with each other than to resist it.

We need not rely on logic to decide whether separation is an illusion.

If we turn instead to our direct experience, it soon becomes apparent that while the skin is a kind of physical container for the body, we are able to sense activity beyond the boundaries of the physical body. More dramatically, without a constant intake of oxygen from “outside,” life on the

“inside” soon ceases. Science now tells us that the same molecules that make up our bodies are rapidly recycled and exchanged with other entities. The same, of course, is true for the need for resources from outside the boundary of the family. A single individual or a single couple or family cannot exist without ongoing interactions with a larger human and natural environment.

Polyamory breaks down cultural patterns of control as well as ownership and property rights between persons and, by replacing them with a family milieu of unconditional love, trust, and respect, provides an avenue to the creation of a more just and peaceful world. By changing the size, structure, and emotional context of the family, the personalities of the children developing in these families naturally change. Children learn by example.

We cannot teach our children to share and to love one another when we jealously guard and covertly control our most precious possessions—our spouses. By making the boundaries of the family more flexible and more permeable to the outside world, we set the stage for a new worldview in which we recognize our kinship with all of humanity.

Polyamory also offers abundant opportunities to practice the
law of
forgiveness
. This law is crucial because forgiveness is both the means by which it’s possible to love oneself and others unconditionally and the evidence of this love. The nature of being human is that we make mistakes, especially when attempting a new and challenging way of loving. Without
2 4 0

C H A P T E R 1 1

always allowing a second chance, this effort would be doomed. It is the capacity to forgive and forget that allows us to release conditional love one condition at a time, as many times as necessary. When someone loves us, even after finding out about our secret “flaws,” even knowing that we may love and desire others, the separation we feel from love is healed. This healing is forgiveness.

Shifting our beliefs about love in all these ways directly benefits those involved by creating more functional and workable relationships. At the same time, these effects ripple out as a gift to the rest of the world.

At the start of the sexual revolution in the 1960s, many people thought that creating honest nonmonogamous relationships would be easy. Instead, half a century of false starts and painful discoveries has taught us that polyamory exacts a price. The fact is that most twenty-first-century humans have many contradictory impulses that pull us in the direction of inclusive love and simultaneously push us in the direction of jealousy and possessiveness.

These opposing forces must be reconciled before we are truly free to love.

Polyamory places people in the center of the cyclone, with an abundance of opportunities to confront these opposing forces and to learn from their mistakes along the way. Learning theorists have found that the more mistakes you make, the faster you learn. In polyamory, it’s possible to get the benefit of several lifetimes worth of mistakes in a relatively short time because you are engaging in more than one intimate relationship at a time.

Polyamorous relationships have another major advantage in accelerating personal growth. Intimate relationships at their best are a path to higher consciousness and greater self-knowledge, largely because of the valuable feedback—or mirroring effect—one receives from a beloved. Having more than one partner at a time not only increases the available quantity of feedback but also makes it harder to blame your partner for the problems you might be creating in the relationship. Of course, serial monogamy also offers the opportunity to see the same issues arise in one relationship after another, but not only does it take longer to get the lesson, but, if you’re a fast talker, you may be able to convince one person at a time that it’s not your fault, whereas two are less likely to be fooled.

T H E C O S T S A N D B E N E F I T S O F P O L Y A M O R Y

2 4 1

Bill is an attractive man in his late forties who has never been married.

Over the years, he’d had a series of monogamous relationships, each lasting about four years. “I’m not sure why none of these relationships lasted,”

he told me. “I always assumed it just wasn’t a match and moved on to the next woman, but I’m getting older, and I really want to settle down.” Bill decided he wanted to try polyamory and took my advice to start by seeking out women who weren’t seeking a monogamous commitment. Soon he was dating three different women and was thrilled when it turned out that two of them knew and liked each other. After a few months, however, he found himself struggling. “Liz, Helen, and Angie are all mad at me,” he complained. “They started comparing notes and found out I’d told some white lies. Now they’re accusing me of manipulating them. I really don’t understand what their problem is, but I’d like to find out. Can you help me?” Bill was reaping the benefits of polyamory in a different way than he’d expected, but his openness to taking a look at himself—once three women instead of one were insisting on it—was promising.

Because multiple-partner relationships are inherently more complex and demanding than monogamous ones and because they challenge the norms of our culture, they offer other valuable learning opportunities.

Lessons about loving yourself, about tolerance for diversity, about speaking from the heart and communicating clearly, and about learning to trust an internal sense of rightness and to think for yourself rather than blindly relying on outside opinion are only a sampling of the lessons. These qualities are earmarks of an emotionally and spiritually mature person—the kind of person who makes a good parent and who can contribute to his or her community.

POLYAMORY AND THE FUTURE OF THE FAMILY

One of the most common concerns about polyamory is that it’s harmful to children, but nothing could be farther from the truth. As we saw in chapter 7, multiple-adult families and committed intimate networks have the potential of providing dependent children with additional nurturing adults who can meet their material, intellectual, and emotional needs. While parents may end up focusing less attention on their children, children may gain new aunts, uncles, and adopted parents.

2 4 2

C H A P T E R 1 1

More adults sharing parenting can mean less stress and less burnout without losing any of the rewards. In a larger group of men and women, it’s more likely that one or two adults will be willing and able to stay home and care for the family or that each could be available one or two days a week.

If one parent dies or becomes disabled, other family members can fill the gap. It’s possible for children to have more role models, more playmates, and more love in a group environment. Of course, these advantages can be found in any community setting, but people sometimes avoid intimacy with other adults in a conscious or unconscious effort to safeguard a monogamous commitment.

Polyamory can help create stable and nurturing families where children develop in an atmosphere of love and security. With the traditional nuclear family well on its way to extinction, we are faced with a question of critical importance: who will mind the children? Neither two-career nor single-parent families offer children full-time, loving caretakers, and quality day care is both scarce and expensive. Even at its best, full-time institutional care (including public schooling) cannot provide the individual attention, intimacy, flexibility, and opportunity for solitude that children need to realize their potential. Serial monogamy presents children as well as parents with a stressfully discontinuous family life. Meanwhile, an entire generation is at risk, as divorce is an increasingly common fact of life.

We don’t yet know how polyamory impacts the rate of divorce; the little data we have suggest that it doesn’t. Some people have begun to joke about

“serial polyamory,” and it may turn out that any kind of lasting relationship is simply less likely in the twenty-first century. We do know that practicing polyamory can help prepare parents to maintain family ties after a divorce because the issue of becoming jealous when confronted with a former mate’s new partner has usually been dealt with already.

Polyamory can mean a higher standard of living while consuming fewer resources. Sexualoving partners are more likely than friends or neighbors to feel comfortable sharing housing, transportation, appliances, and other resources. Even if partners don’t live communally, they frequently share meals, help each other with household repairs and projects, and vacation together. This kind of cooperation helps provide a higher quality of life while reducing individual consumption as well as keeping people too busy to overconsume. Multiple partners also help in the renewal of our devastated human ecology by creating a sense of bonded community.

T H E C O S T S A N D B E N E F I T S O F P O L Y A M O R Y

2 4 3

Polyamory can help parents and children alike adapt to an ever more complex and quickly changing world. One of the greatest challenges facing humans at the dawn of the twenty-first century is coping with the increasingly fast pace of life. We’re constantly being inundated with more information than we can absorb and more choices than we can evaluate.

New technologies are becoming obsolete almost before we can implement them. Trying to keep up can be stressful if not impossible for a single person or a couple. But a small group of loving and well-coordinated partners can divide up tasks that would overwhelm one or two people. Multiple-partner relationships can be an antidote to future shock.

POLYAMORY AND CHANGING SEX ROLE STEREOTYPES

One of the most difficult challenges confronting men and women in the twenty-first century is making the transition from the rigid and well-defined gender identities prevalent in the twentieth century to the more fluid and androgynous roles preferred by many individuals. Diverse opinions as to the healthiest, most natural, and most functional approach to gender roles are still being debated by social scientists, psychotherapists, and spiritual teachers. Most people would agree, however, that both John Wayne–style masculinity and the classic 1950s housewife version of femininity, as well as any identity based solely on gender, are prescriptions for unhappiness.

While the extreme versions of these old stereotypes are increasingly rare, many people are still struggling with the more subtle effects of generations of gender-based tyranny.

Marriage as we know it today is based on patterns established in biblical times governing men’s ownership of women. Polyamory can help men and women break out of dysfunctional sex roles and achieve more equal, sexually gratifying, and respectful relationships simply because of its nov-elty. Most of us have unconsciously absorbed our culture’s messages about proper demeanor for husbands and wives. We may think our modern society has left this legacy behind, but remember that women in the United States have had the right to vote for less than 100 years. Polyamory leads us to confront the sex role conditioning of our ancestors and demands that we transcend it. It requires that men and women alike overcome our competitive programming and that we invent new ways of relating since we can
2 4 4

C H A P T E R 1 1

no longer fall back on simply doing it the way Mom and Dad or Grandma and Grandpa did it.

There’s no doubt that polyamory presents multiple challenges to those attempting to practice it. The stakes are high when we put our hearts, minds, and bodies on the line, but the reality is that refusing to do so is becoming increasingly untenable.